TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be imposed on an importer who was not engaged in manufacture and whose goods were neither excisable goods in his hands nor liable to confiscation at his hands.
Analysis: Rule 209A requires three elements before penalty can be imposed: the person must be concerned with dealing in the goods, the goods must be excisable goods, and the person must know or have reason to believe that the goods are liable to confiscation. Even assuming the first element, the appellant was only an importer and the goods did not become excisable goods in his hands, as they became excisable only after manufacture by the purchaser. The record also did not show that the goods were liable to confiscation while with the appellant, since there was no allegation of evasion of excise duty or clandestine removal by him.
Conclusion: Penalty under Rule 209A was not sustainable against the appellant.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the questions of law were answered in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 can be imposed only when all statutory conditions are satisfied, including that the goods dealt with are excisable goods and are liable to confiscation with the requisite knowledge or belief.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
