Clandestine removal and unaccounted clearances sustain duty demand, while personal penalty needs proof of conscious involvement.

Clandestine removals evidenced by seized records, intercepted goods and admissions can sustain duty demand, and a party cannot claim set-off or adjustment on the basis of fabricated invoices or unaccounted clearances. Unrecorded job-work manufacture and clearance of PVC pipes justified treating the concern as the manufacturer for the disputed goods, with duty and denial of job-work and SSI exemption benefits following for those clearances. Personal penalties require incriminating material showing conscious involvement: penalties were sustained where participation in evasion was established, but set aside where no such material existed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the demand of duty and denial of set-off in respect of the clearances traced to M/s. Vijay Aqua Pipes Pvt. Ltd. were sustainable on the basis of the seized files, statements and admitted clandestine removals; (ii) whether M/s. Mathura Polymers Pvt. Ltd. was liable for duty and consequential denial of exemption benefits on account of unaccounted job-work manufacture and clearances; and (iii) whether the penalties imposed on the individual appellants were justified, including the penalty on Shri V. Natarajan.

Issue (i): Whether the demand of duty and denial of set-off in respect of the clearances traced to M/s. Vijay Aqua Pipes Pvt. Ltd. were sustainable on the basis of the seized files, statements and admitted clandestine removals.

Analysis: The evidence from the search proceedings, including the intercepted truck, the recovered files and the statements of the concerned persons, established clandestine removals by M/s. Vijay Aqua Pipes Pvt. Ltd. The demand based on the contents of the seized material was not displaced by any cogent rebuttal. The plea for set-off of duty shown in fabricated invoices was rejected because a party who commits evasion cannot derive relief from its own wrong.

Conclusion: The duty demand against M/s. Vijay Aqua Pipes Pvt. Ltd. was sustained and the claim for adjustment or set-off was rejected.

Issue (ii): Whether M/s. Mathura Polymers Pvt. Ltd. was liable for duty and consequential denial of exemption benefits on account of unaccounted job-work manufacture and clearances.

Analysis: The record showed that M/s. Mathura Polymers Pvt. Ltd. manufactured and cleared PVC pipes without accounting for them in the statutory records and without following central excise procedure. The Tribunal treated the concern as the manufacturer for the disputed clearances and held that the evasion involved both the principal and the job worker. In that setting, exemption under the job-work notification and SSI relief could not be invoked for unaccounted clearances, and the duty demand was upheld.

Conclusion: The duty demand against M/s. Mathura Polymers Pvt. Ltd. was sustained and the exemption claims were rejected.

Issue (iii): Whether the penalties imposed on the individual appellants were justified, including the penalty on Shri V. Natarajan.

Analysis: The penalties on Shri S. Nainar and Shri S. Thiagarajan were sustained because the evidence showed their conscious involvement in the evasion. In contrast, no incriminating material was found against Shri V. Natarajan, and the available evidence did not justify fastening personal penalty on him.

Conclusion: The penalties on Shri S. Nainar and Shri S. Thiagarajan were upheld, while the penalty on Shri V. Natarajan was set aside.

Final Conclusion: The appeals were substantially rejected on the core duty demands and penalties, but personal penalty relief was granted to Shri V. Natarajan.

Ratio Decidendi: Clandestine removals proved by seized records and admissions sustain duty demand, and exemption or adjustment cannot be claimed on the basis of unaccounted or fabricated clearances; personal penalty requires incriminating evidence of conscious involvement.

---