Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether service tax paid on transportation of exported goods from the factory gate, depot or other place of removal to the port of export is eligible for Cenvat credit or refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004; (ii) Whether service tax paid on transportation of goods delivered at the buyer's place under the contract of sale, before and after 01.04.2008, is admissible as Cenvat credit.
Issue (i): Whether service tax paid on transportation of exported goods from the factory gate, depot or other place of removal to the port of export is eligible for Cenvat credit or refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: The decisive question is the point at which property in the goods passes and, therefore, the place of removal is to be identified. The applicable framework is Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, read with the concept of place of removal under the Central Excise law and the Sale of Goods Act, 1930. For export clearances, the port/ICD/CFS where the shipping bill is filed and control over the goods effectively passes after Let Export Order is issued is treated as the relevant place of removal. Transportation service used up to that point forms part of the clearance of goods for export and is not a post-clearance incidence disentitling credit. Where credit cannot be adjusted, refund under Rule 5 follows the same entitlement.
Conclusion: Service tax paid on transportation of exported goods up to the port of export is admissible as Cenvat credit and, where unutilised, refundable under Rule 5.
Issue (ii): Whether service tax paid on transportation of goods delivered at the buyer's place under the contract of sale, before and after 01.04.2008, is admissible as Cenvat credit.
Analysis: The governing principle is that the place of removal depends on when property in the goods passes under the contract, as determined by Section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, together with the contractual terms, conduct of parties and surrounding circumstances. The Board circulars relied upon in the order recognise that where the contract shows that ownership, risk and delivery obligations continue till delivery at the destination, the place where sale is completed becomes the place of removal. The later definition of place of removal in Rule 2(qa) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not alter this fundamental sale-law test. Transportation service used to discharge the seller's contractual obligation up to the destination therefore qualifies as input service.
Conclusion: Service tax paid on transportation up to the buyer's delivery point is admissible as Cenvat credit where the contract shows that sale and transfer of property occur at that point.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeed on the legal issues, the assessees are held entitled to Cenvat credit or refund on the stated transportation services where the factual matrix supports the claim, no penalty is warranted, and the matters are remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with the stated principles.
Ratio Decidendi: For Cenvat credit on outward transportation, the controlling test is the contractual place at which property in the goods passes and sale is completed; transportation service used up to that legally determined place of removal is an input service, including in export clearances up to the export port.