Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether second hand digital multifunction print and copying machines imported without authorisation could be provisionally released on payment of customs duty and furnishing of bond pending adjudication.
Analysis: The import policy amendment made such goods restricted and importable only against authorisation. The Court nevertheless found no infirmity in the direction for provisional release because the goods were liable to be adjudicated under the Customs Act, the show cause notice had already been issued, and the importer could be required to secure the revenue by furnishing a bond and paying duty. The Court also noted that inconsistent practices across customs formations had led to divergent treatment, but that did not justify interference with the order under challenge.
Conclusion: Provisional release subject to payment of duty, furnishing of bond, and final adjudication was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Restricted imported goods may be provisionally released pending adjudication when revenue is secured by duty payment and bond, even if import was without authorisation, subject to the outcome of confiscation and penalty proceedings.