TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether dismissal of the appeal for non-deposit of 25% of the additional demand under Section 62(5) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was justified, and whether the matter required remand to the first appellate authority.
Analysis: The issue was governed by the earlier decision holding that the requirement of pre-deposit under Section 62(5) is directory and that the first appellate authority has implied power, in appropriate cases, to grant interim protection and to waive the condition of pre-deposit in whole or in part. Where an appeal has been rejected solely for want of pre-deposit without examination of the merits, such orders cannot stand in light of that ruling and the matter must return to the first appellate authority for fresh consideration in accordance with the stated legal principles.
Conclusion: The orders dismissing the appeal for non-deposit were set aside and the matter was remanded to the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals). The appellant obtained relief on the legal issue of mandatory pre-deposit.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the pre-deposit-based dismissal was annulled and the dispute was sent back for reconsideration by the first appellate authority.
Ratio Decidendi: The pre-deposit requirement under Section 62(5) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 is directory and may be waived, wholly or partly, by the first appellate authority in deserving cases.
TaxTMI 
