Court sanctions Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 1956 without separate meetings

The Court granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation of Survandan Developers Private Limited with DBS Affordable Home Strategy Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court dispensed with the need for separate proceedings and meetings of shareholders and creditors. After reviewing reports from the Regional Director and Official Liquidator, the Court found the Scheme appropriate and directed record preservation and compliance with stamp duty adjudication. The Scheme was sanctioned, and the petitioner was instructed to file the order with relevant authorities, with authenticated copies to be used for further actions.

---

---

Issues:
1. Sanction of Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Analysis:
The petitioner sought the Court's approval for the Scheme of Amalgamation of Survandan Developers Private Limited with DBS Affordable Home Strategy Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Transferee Company, being the holding company, had earlier filed an application for dispensation of separate proceedings, which was allowed by the Court. The Transferor Company also sought dispensation of meetings of Equity Shareholders, Secured Creditors, and Unsecured Creditors, which was granted. Subsequently, the petitioner filed a petition seeking sanction for the Scheme, which was admitted by the Court. Notice was issued to the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator, and the petition was published in local newspapers.

The Regional Director and the Official Liquidator submitted their reports, with the Official Liquidator confirming that the affairs of the Transferor Company were not prejudicial. The Regional Director raised an observation regarding compliance with the Income Tax Act, to which the petitioner responded, stating that any liabilities would be borne by the Transferee Company as per the Scheme. After considering the reports and relevant documents, the Court found it appropriate to grant sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. The Court directed the petitioner to preserve its records and not dispose of them without prior permission under Section 396A of the Companies Act, 1956.

The Scheme of Amalgamation was sanctioned, with instructions for record preservation and compliance with stamp duty adjudication. The petitioner was directed to file the order and Scheme with relevant authorities. Filing and issuance of the drawn-up order were dispensed with, and authorities were instructed to act on authenticated copies. The Registrar was tasked with issuing authenticated copies promptly. The petition was disposed of accordingly, with costs determined and instructions for further actions provided.

---