CESTAT Rules in Favor of Textile Machinery Manufacturers on Service Tax Liability

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellants, who were engaged in manufacturing textile machineries, regarding the service tax liability on installation and erection charges. The Tribunal found that the appellants subcontracted the installation and erection work to agencies already paying service tax on the installed goods. As the appellants had paid excise duty on the entire contracted amount, including these charges, without seeking a separate deduction, the Tribunal concluded that there was no justification for confirming the service tax liability. The appellants were granted an unconditional allowance of the stay petition, leading to a lower total payment by approximately Rs. 3.60 lakhs.

---

---

Issues:
Service tax liability on installation and erection charges in addition to manufacturing cost.

Analysis:
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad dealt with the issue of confirming a service tax liability of Rs. 8,13,41,574 against the appellants, who are engaged in manufacturing textile machineries, for providing installation and erection services at customers' premises. The appellants argued that they had paid excise duty on the entire contracted amount, which included installation and erection charges, without seeking a separate deduction for these charges. The adjudicating authority confirmed the service tax demand, stating that the appellants did not provide a bifurcation of these charges from other manufacturing costs. However, the Tribunal noted that the appellants subcontracted the installation and erection work to independent agencies who were already paying service tax on the installed goods. Therefore, the Tribunal found no justification for confirming the service tax liability when excise duty was being paid on the entire amount.

Moreover, the Tribunal highlighted that if the appellants had deducted the installation and erection charges from the assessable value for central excise duty payment and paid service tax on that amount, they would have paid a lower total amount by approximately Rs. 3.60 lakhs. This led the Tribunal to conclude that the appellants had presented a prima facie case in their favor, warranting the unconditional allowance of the stay petition. The judgment was delivered by Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (J), and Shri B.S.V. Murthy, Member (T) at the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad.

---