Section 263 revision fails where the notice is exceeded, a plausible assessment view is ignored, and accounting entries are taxed as income.

Section 263 revision was held unsustainable where the final order travelled beyond the show-cause notice and decided issues not put to the assessee, as effective opportunity is essential to revisional jurisdiction. The Assessing Officer's allowance of credit for deemed dividend tax under the India-Oman DTAA was also upheld because it was a plausible view taken after enquiry and in line with the consistent position accepted in earlier years; revision cannot substitute a different interpretation. The direction to tax undistributed branch profit was rejected because the amount was only an accounting entry and did not represent real income accrued or received. The assessment revisions were quashed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the revisional order under section 263 was vitiated because it travelled beyond the show-cause notice and was passed without opportunity on all the issues decided; (ii) whether the Assessing Officer had taken a plausible view on the tax credit for deemed dividend tax under the India-Oman DTAA, so that revision under section 263 was not justified; (iii) whether the direction to tax the undistributed share of profit reflected in the foreign branch accounts was sustainable.

Issue (i): Whether the revisional order under section 263 was vitiated because it travelled beyond the show-cause notice and was passed without opportunity on all the issues decided?

Analysis: The notice under section 263 covered only the tax credit on dividend income, but the final order also directed taxation of undistributed profits and recorded a view on alleged non-furnishing of complete and true income. Those additional matters were not put to the assessee in the notice. A revisional order must remain correlated to the grounds on which the assessee was asked to show cause, and effective opportunity is an essential requirement of the revisional process.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. The order under section 263 was vitiated for breach of natural justice to the extent it dealt with matters outside the show-cause notice.

Issue (ii): Whether the Assessing Officer had taken a plausible view on the tax credit for deemed dividend tax under the India-Oman DTAA, so that revision under section 263 was not justified?

Analysis: The claim for credit had been examined in scrutiny assessment by detailed queries and replies. The same benefit had also been accepted in earlier assessment years on a consistent factual and legal basis. The Tribunal found that the Omani exemption for dividend income was intended to promote economic development and that Article 25(4) of the DTAA covered tax that would have been payable but for such incentive. Where the Assessing Officer adopts one of the permissible views after enquiry, the revisional authority cannot substitute another view merely because it prefers a different interpretation.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. The tax credit for deemed dividend tax was allowable, and section 263 could not be invoked to displace the Assessing Officer's view.

Issue (iii): Whether the direction to tax the undistributed share of profit reflected in the foreign branch accounts was sustainable?

Analysis: The undistributed share of profit was only a book entry in the branch accounts prepared under accounting standards and did not represent real income received or accrued to the assessee. Taxability under the Income-tax Act depends on real income, not merely accounting presentation. The Tribunal therefore found no basis for bringing the undistributed profit to tax on the facts before it.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. The direction to tax the undistributed profit was not sustainable.

Final Conclusion: The revisional orders were held unsustainable in law, and the assessee's appeals succeeded with the assessment revisions quashed.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 263 cannot be used to revise an assessment on grounds not contained in the show-cause notice, and it also cannot be invoked where the Assessing Officer has adopted a plausible view after enquiry on the basis of a consistent factual and legal position.

---