Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed for delayed payment of service tax under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 was liable to be set aside having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case.
Analysis: The appellant was new to the business and had paid the service tax and interest after being visited by the departmental officers. The earlier authority had imposed penalty, and the appellate authority had sustained a reduced penalty on the basis of an allegedly prolonged delay. On the facts found, the delay as characterised below was not accepted as a proper basis for sustaining penalty, and the overall circumstances indicated that the penal levy was not warranted.
Conclusion: The penalty of Rs. 20,000/- was set aside and the appeal was allowed.