Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit taken by the recipient unit on goods transferred inter-unit was liable to be denied on the ground that the supplying units had adopted a higher provisional assessable value and paid excess duty.
Analysis: The goods cleared from the supplying units were assessed provisionally, and the higher value was adopted to account for possible fluctuation in input costs. The duty was actually paid on that basis, the assessments were later finalised under CAS-4 norms, and no refund was claimed by the supplying units. The record disclosed no fraud, manipulation, or revision of assessment warranting reduction of credit. On these facts, the duty paid by the supplying units was the duty available for credit, and the overall exercise was revenue neutral.
Conclusion: The credit could not be denied to the recipient unit and the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.