Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (6) TMI 1385 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Royalty payments to associated enterprises deemed arm's length despite TPO restrictions; CCD interest deductible as debt ITAT Bangalore held that the assessee's royalty payment to associated enterprises was at arm's length, rejecting TPO's 1% restriction based on prior ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Royalty payments to associated enterprises deemed arm's length despite TPO restrictions; CCD interest deductible as debt

                          ITAT Bangalore held that the assessee's royalty payment to associated enterprises was at arm's length, rejecting TPO's 1% restriction based on prior tribunal decisions in the assessee's own case. Regarding CCDs, the tribunal ruled that until conversion, CCDs should be treated as debt for income tax purposes, allowing interest deduction despite RBI's equity classification for FDI policy. The interest rate benchmarking using average rupee cost compared to SBI prime lending rate was accepted. The TDS matter was remanded to AO for examination of the assessee's credit entitlement.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. TP adjustment of Rs. 51,76,98,493/- in respect of payment of royalty.
                          2. TP adjustment of Rs. 326,04,19,415/- in respect of payment of interest on CCDs, premium expenditure on repayment of CCDs, and interest on RDBs.
                          3. Short credit of tax deducted at source.

                          Summary:

                          1. TP Adjustment of Rs. 51,76,98,493/- (Payment of Royalty):
                          The Tribunal addressed the issue of TP adjustment of Rs. 51,76,98,493/- for royalty payment by the assessee to its AE. The assessee argued that this issue had been previously decided in its favor for earlier assessment years, where the payment of royalty was held to be at arm's length. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had benchmarked the transaction using the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method and the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM), both concluding the transaction to be at arm's length. However, the TPO had restricted the ALP transaction to 1%, relying on earlier assessment orders. The Tribunal found that in earlier years, the payment of royalty at 4% was accepted as at arm's length. Therefore, following the precedent, the Tribunal held that the payment of royalty by the assessee for the current year should also be treated as at arm's length and allowed the grounds in favor of the assessee.

                          2. TP Adjustment of Rs. 326,04,19,415/- (Interest on CCDs, Premium Expenditure on Repayment of CCDs, and Interest on RDBs):
                          The assessee contested the TP adjustment of Rs. 326,04,19,415/- related to interest on CCDs, premium expenditure on repayment of CCDs, and interest on RDBs. The TPO had recharacterized CCDs as equity and held the payments as non-interest in nature, determining the arm's length price of interest payment on CCDs to be NIL. The DRP upheld the TPO's order. The assessee argued that the TPO and DRP erred in treating CCDs as equity and cited previous Tribunal decisions, including its own case, where CCDs were considered debt until conversion. The Tribunal, referencing its earlier decisions and the case of CAE Flight Training (India) Pvt. Ltd., reiterated that CCDs are debt until conversion and recharacterization is impermissible. The Tribunal restored the matter to the files of the AO/TPO to pass fresh orders, complying with the Tribunal's direction for earlier assessment years. Thus, the grounds were partly allowed for statistical purposes.

                          3. Short Credit of Tax Deducted at Source:
                          The assessee claimed a short credit of TDS amounting to Rs. 6,39,26,468/-, whereas the AO had granted credit for Rs. 6,33,49,371/-. The Tribunal directed the AO to examine the entitlement of the entire credit claimed by the assessee and pass an order after providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Consequently, this ground was allowed for statistical purposes.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, with specific directions for fresh orders on TP adjustments and examination of TDS credit.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found