Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the jurisdiction of the Civil Court and the appellate proceedings arising from a suit instituted before the commencement of the Wakf Act, 1995 were taken away by the bar under Section 85, or whether Section 7(5) saved pending suits, appeals and revisions from the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
Analysis: Section 85 bars civil court proceedings in respect of matters required to be determined by the Tribunal, but Section 7(5) creates a specific exception for matters already instituted or commenced in a Civil Court before the commencement of the Act, including appeals, revisions and review arising out of such suits. Reading these provisions together, the Act was held to operate prospectively and not to unsettle pending matters that had commenced prior to 1.1.1996. Since the suit in question had been instituted long before the commencement of the Act and the appeal arose from that pending suit, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to reopen or determine it.
Conclusion: The view that the matter had to be taken to the Wakf Tribunal was held to be incorrect, and the High Court's order was set aside with a direction that the appeal be decided by the High Court in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 85 of the Wakf Act, 1995 does not divest civil courts or appellate courts of jurisdiction over suits and connected proceedings instituted before the commencement of the Act, because Section 7(5) expressly excludes such pending matters from the Tribunal's jurisdiction.