Accession to mortgaged property may be sold in execution even if omitted from the decree description, the court held.

Buildings standing on mortgaged land may be sold in execution as accession to the mortgaged property even if they are not specifically described in the final mortgage decree, where the substance of the transaction shows they replaced or formed part of the original subject matter. The court emphasized that execution should follow the real effect of the mortgage rather than a narrow technical description, and noted that any omission in the decree description could, if necessary, be corrected by amendment under the court's inherent powers. On that footing, the objection to sale of the buildings failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether buildings standing on the mortgaged land, though not specifically described in the final mortgage decree, could be sold in execution as accession to the mortgaged property, and whether the decree description could be treated as amendable under the court's inherent powers.

Analysis: The mortgagor had previously owned a wooden house on the land, but by the time of the mortgage that structure had been demolished and new buildings were under construction or had replaced it. The Court held that, in execution, the substance of the transaction must prevail over mere technical description. A mortgagee is entitled to have accession to the property originally mortgaged sold under the final decree even if such accession is not expressly mentioned. The Court also observed that, if necessary, the description in the decree could have been corrected by amendment under the inherent powers of the Court.

Conclusion: The buildings sought to be sold were liable to sale in execution of the mortgage decree, and the objection to their inclusion failed.

---