Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether removal of a Pradhan under the proviso to Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act required a reasonable opportunity of showing cause at two stages, namely during the enquiry and after findings were recorded before the proposed action was finalised.
Analysis: The proviso to Section 95(1)(g) bars action unless the person concerned is given a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the proposed action. The expression was construed in the light of settled authority to mean that the person must first have the opportunity to meet the charges in the enquiry and later, after findings are recorded and the proposed action is contemplated, to show why the action should not be taken. The fact that the incumbent was a Pradhan and not a Government servant did not alter the statutory content of the safeguard, because the legislature used language that had already acquired a definite legal meaning.
Conclusion: The removal order was invalid because the appellant was not given the second opportunity after the findings were recorded, and the challenge succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, the writ petition stood dismissed, and the removal order was quashed for breach of the statutory requirement of reasonable opportunity.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute requires a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against proposed action, the safeguard includes an opportunity to meet the charges at the enquiry stage and a further opportunity after findings are recorded and before the proposed penalty is imposed.