TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court Registry could refuse to number an anticipatory bail petition on the ground that it was not maintainable in view of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Analysis: Numbering of a petition is an administrative act, while deciding maintainability in the context of section 18A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 requires judicial application of mind. The Registry could not assume the court's judicial function by examining whether the anticipatory bail petition was maintainable. The proper course was to number the petition and place it before the appropriate Bench for adjudication.
Conclusion: The Registry could not refuse numbering of the anticipatory bail petition on maintainability grounds and was directed to number the petition and place it before an appropriate Bench.
TaxTMI 
