Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the scheme of amalgamation could be sanctioned under section 233 of the Companies Act, 2013 in the facts of the case.
Analysis: The transferor companies were wholly owned subsidiaries of the transferee company and there were no secured or unsecured creditors whose meetings were required to be convened. The record showed approval of the scheme by the members, no objection from the Registrar of Companies, no objection from the Official Liquidator, and the scheme was found to be fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public policy or law. The Tribunal also noted that the scheme did not prejudice the interests of shareholders and that the requisite statutory compliances had been fulfilled.
Conclusion: The scheme of amalgamation was sanctioned and the petition was allowed.
Final Conclusion: The application succeeded and the amalgamation scheme was approved with binding effect on the members, creditors, and shareholders.
Ratio Decidendi: A scheme under section 233 of the Companies Act, 2013 may be sanctioned where the statutory requirements are complied with, the scheme is fair and reasonable, and no material objection is raised by the regulatory authorities.