Lok Adalat award finality: third-party writ challenge fails absent proven fraud, misrepresentation, or absence of settlement.

An award of Lok Adalat made on a genuine compromise or settlement has finality and binding effect under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and may be challenged in writ jurisdiction only where it is shown to be vitiated by impersonation, misrepresentation, fraud, or the absence of any valid settlement. A third party ordinarily cannot impeach such an award in writ proceedings and must pursue a separate civil action for declaration, unless exceptional circumstances establish prima facie fraud or collusion. On the facts, the compromise was signed by the original parties and no credible fraud or illegality was proved, so the award remained valid and binding and the writ petition was not maintainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the award of the Lok Adalat was vitiated by illegality, fraud or impropriety and could be challenged in writ jurisdiction at the instance of third parties.

Analysis: An award of Lok Adalat has finality and binding effect under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 when it is made on the basis of a compromise or settlement between the parties. Where no compromise or settlement exists, or where the award is obtained by impersonation, misrepresentation or fraud, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 can be invoked because such an order would not answer the statutory concept of a valid Lok Adalat award. A third party ordinarily cannot impeach such an award in writ proceedings; the normal remedy is a separate civil action for declaration, though a writ may lie in exceptional cases where prima facie fraud, collusion or misrepresentation is shown. On the facts, the record showed that the parties to the original dispute had signed the compromise, the petitioners were not shown to be parties to the partnership arrangement asserted by them, and the surrounding circumstances did not establish any credible fraud or illegality in the award.

Conclusion: The award was held to be valid and binding, and the writ petition by the petitioners was not maintainable on the facts presented.

---