Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a sub-contractor providing services in a Special Economic Zone in relation to authorised operations is entitled to exemption from service tax under Notification No. 9/2009-ST dated 03.03.2009 as amended by Notification No. 15/2009-ST dated 20.05.2009.
Analysis: The exemption was denied only on the ground that the appellant acted as a sub-contractor and did not provide services directly to the SEZ unit or developer. On a plain reading of the notification, the relevant criteria are that the services must be provided in relation to authorised operations in the SEZ and received by a developer or unit. The services in question were approved by the competent authority and were rendered in relation to authorised operations in the SEZ. The fact that the appellant acted as a sub-contractor did not defeat the exemption, and the cited Tribunal decisions supported that view.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the exemption and denial of exemption was unjustified.