Depreciation on Goodwill Allowed: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Decision Post-Amalgamation, Citing Supreme Court Precedent. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals against the CIT(A)'s orders allowing depreciation on goodwill claimed by the assessee following an amalgamation. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals against the CIT(A)'s orders allowing depreciation on goodwill claimed by the assessee following an amalgamation. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing the Supreme Court's ruling in Smifs Securities Ltd., affirming that goodwill qualifies for depreciation under section 32 of the Act.
Issues: Deletion of addition made by AO on account of disallowance of depreciation on goodwill.
Analysis: The case involved two appeals by the Revenue against separate orders of the CIT(A)-3, Delhi regarding the deletion of addition made by the AO on account of disallowance of depreciation on goodwill. The appellant company underwent amalgamation with another company, and as per the scheme of amalgamation, the excess amount debited to the goodwill account was claimed as depreciation by the assessee. The AO denied this claim, leading the assessee to appeal before the CIT(A) reiterating its claim of depreciation on goodwill. The CIT(A) allowed the depreciation, emphasizing that goodwill, being a non-tangible asset, is eligible for depreciation under section 32 of the Act.
The DR strongly supported the Assessment Order before the Tribunal, arguing against the allowance of depreciation on goodwill. However, the Tribunal referred to a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Smifs Securities Ltd. 348 ITR 302, where it was settled that goodwill is eligible for depreciation. The Tribunal found no error or infirmity in the CIT(A)'s findings and dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue. The decision was announced in the open court in the presence of both representatives on 08.09.2021.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.