Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether unmounted brake linings used as components of motor vehicles were classifiable under Heading 87.08 as parts and accessories of motor vehicles, or under Heading 70.14 as articles of glass fibre.
Analysis: The goods were inspected as samples and were admittedly designed for use as motor vehicle components. The department failed to produce technical material or test results establishing that the asbestos-free item was wholly or predominantly composed of glass fibre. In the absence of proof of such composition, and given that the goods were specifically made for use as parts of motor vehicles, the specific motor-vehicle entry was held to apply rather than the glass-fibre entry.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 87.08 and not under Heading 70.14. The finding was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are specially designed for use as parts of motor vehicles and the department fails to prove a competing material composition, the specific motor-vehicle heading prevails over the claimed glass-fibre classification.