PVC classification under Heading 3904 supported concessional customs duty benefit for vinyl chloride polymers despite a broader general entry.

Imported PVC compound classified under Heading 3904 was treated as falling within the PVC family for exemption purposes, so the concessional rate under Sr. No. 480 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. for polymers of vinyl chloride applied. The tribunal noted that the department had already accepted classification under Heading 3904 22 90, and that this admitted classification could not be contradicted when determining eligibility for the notification entry. It further held that chapter notes and section notes aid classification, and earlier decisions confirm that PVC compounds and copolymers in primary form remain within the scope of the PVC concessional entry unless expressly excluded. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported PVC compound, classified under Heading 3904, was entitled to the concessional rate of duty under Sr. No. 480 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. as polymers of vinyl chloride, or whether it was confined to the general entry at Sr. No. 559.

Analysis: The imported goods were accepted as classifiable under Heading 3904 and the dispute was only about the applicable exemption entry. The notification entry at Sr. No. 480 covered polymers of vinyl chloride under Heading 3904, while Sr. No. 559 covered a wider range of goods. Since the department itself accepted classification under Heading 3904 22 90, the goods necessarily fell within the PVC family covered by Heading 3904. The tribunal held that section notes and chapter notes aid classification, but the admitted classification could not be contradicted for exemption purposes. Earlier tribunal decisions were relied upon to hold that all forms of PVC, including PVC compounds and copolymers in primary forms, remain within the scope of the PVC entry in the notification.

Conclusion: The imported goods were eligible for the benefit of Sr. No. 480 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., and denial of that exemption was unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the assessee's claim to the concessional duty benefit was accepted.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are accepted as falling under Heading 3904, an exemption entry for polymers of vinyl chloride cannot be denied by taking a contrary view on the same goods for notification purposes; all forms of PVC covered by that heading fall within the concessional entry unless expressly excluded.

---