Supreme Court Restores Acquittal, Overturns High Court Conviction Under Negotiable Instruments Act Due to Lack of Evidence.

The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the HC's judgment convicting the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The SC found that the HC erred in overturning the Trial Court's decision, as there was no evidence of an existing debt or liability against which the cheque was issued. Consequently, the SC restored the Trial Court's acquittal of the appellant.

---

---

Issues:
Appeal against judgment of High Court convicting appellant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act based on bounced cheque.

Analysis:
The appellant was accused in a case where a cheque issued by him bounced upon presentation. The Trial Court acquitted the appellant as the basic ingredient of conveyance in a property sale was not proved. The High Court, in an appeal by the complainant, found the appellant guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to imprisonment and fine. The Supreme Court noted that no evidence of conveyance in favor of the appellant was produced, thus accepting the appellant's argument of no existing debt or liability against which the cheque was given. The Court held that the High Court erred in overturning the Trial Court's decision and allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the Trial Court's acquittal order.

---