Revenue's appeal dismissed as sundry creditors section 68 applies only to current year credits not opening balances

The ITAT Kolkata dismissed the Revenue's appeal in two matters. Regarding sundry creditors, the Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of additions, ruling that section 68 provisions apply only to amounts credited in the relevant assessment year, not opening balances from previous years. For bogus purchases, the Tribunal confirmed CIT(A)'s deletion of additions, noting that since the AO accepted sales figures and the assessee made payments to parties in subsequent years without Revenue disputing this, and books weren't rejected, no addition was warranted. Both deletions were sustained.

---

---

Issues:
1. Deletion of addition of Rs.29,35,211/- in respect of sundry creditors labeled as bogus creditors.
2. Deletion of addition of Rs.29,76,218/- in respect of bogus purchase.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Deletion of addition of Rs.29,35,211/- in respect of sundry creditors labeled as bogus creditors:
The AO added Rs.29,35,211/- as bogus creditors due to sundry creditors' balances carried forward from earlier years. The CIT(A) deleted this addition after considering the submissions and verifying that the amounts were from previous years, not the current year's liability. The ITAT confirmed the deletion, citing Section 68 and the decision in CIT-vs- Sridev Enterprises. The ITAT found no illegality in the CIT(A)'s decision, as the amounts were not credited in the impugned assessment year.

Issue 2: Deletion of addition of Rs.29,76,218/- in respect of bogus purchase:
The AO added Rs.29,76,218/- for alleged bogus purchases from two parties. The CIT(A) deleted this addition after detailed analysis. It was noted that payments were made in the subsequent year, reflecting in the bank accounts. The CIT(A) considered corroborative evidence provided by the assessee and highlighted that the AO did not establish the purchases were not genuine. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the sales shown were accepted, and no rejection of accounts or profit estimation was done. The ITAT concluded that interference was unwarranted, confirming the deletion of the addition.

In conclusion, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s deletions of both the addition of Rs.29,35,211/- in respect of sundry creditors and the addition of Rs.29,76,218/- in respect of bogus purchase.

---