TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Resolves Petition on Company Operation Proof Using December 2021 Precedent.</h1> <h3>AKL Enterprises Pvt Ltd Versus National Company Law Tribunal, Cuttack and another</h3> The HC disposed of the writ petition, aligning it with an earlier order from December 23, 2021. The petitioner's case, involving the ROC and the ... Striking out the name of the company - HELD THAT:- The issue is covered by the decision in the case of LEKA CONSULTING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CUTTACK AND ANOTHER [2021 (12) TMI 1484 - ORISSA HIGH COURT] where it was held that Petitioner might approach the Tribunal to contend that impugned order be amended on the Tribunal not having allowed his client to adduce evidence of the company being in operation, in context of the report having said that his client may be put to strict proof. If the Tribunal is satisfied, it may amend impugned order. Application disposed off. The Orissa High Court, in a judgment by Justice Arindam Sinha, disposed of a writ petition covered by an earlier order dated 23rd December, 2021. The petitioner's advocate pointed out similarities with a previous case involving the Registrar of Companies (ROC) requiring strict proof of the company's operation at the time of striking out. The Court found the current petition aligned with the previous order and resolved it accordingly.
TaxTMI 
