Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. dated 30-8-1997 despite non-compliance with the conditions in the explanation governing direct payment and prescribed mode of payment for invoice price.
Analysis: The notification permitted credit only in respect of specified inputs received directly from the manufacturer under cover of an invoice declaring that the appropriate duty had been paid. The explanation further required that the invoice price be paid directly by the manufacturer of the final products to the manufacturer of the inputs by cheque drawn on the manufacturer's own bank account, or by draft, or by banker's cheque. The conditions in the explanation were treated as mandatory, not merely procedural. Since the payment requirement and mode of payment were not satisfied, the benefit could not be extended. The notification was to be strictly construed, and non-compliance with its express conditions disentitled the assessee to credit.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to Modvat credit under the notification, and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Conditions attached to a concessional or exemption notification granting Modvat credit must be strictly complied with, and failure to satisfy mandatory payment requirements disentitles the assessee to the benefit.