Court Upholds NCLT's Invalidity of IBBI Regulation 36A, Allows Ongoing Expressions of Interest to Proceed Unhindered. The Court did not overturn the NCLT's decision to invalidate Section 36A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India Regulations, acknowledging the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court Upholds NCLT's Invalidity of IBBI Regulation 36A, Allows Ongoing Expressions of Interest to Proceed Unhindered.
The Court did not overturn the NCLT's decision to invalidate Section 36A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India Regulations, acknowledging the Tribunal's stance on time constraints for the "Expression of Interest" process. However, the Court ruled that ongoing processes where the "Expression of Interest" had already been issued should continue unaffected by the NCLT's order. The Court scheduled further examination of the matter for 27.11.2018, ensuring that existing proceedings remain uninterrupted despite the Tribunal's decision.
Issues: 1. Validity of NCLT striking down provisions of Section 36A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India Regulations. 2. Interpretation of time-bound completion of the "Expression of Interest" process by NCLT. 3. Direction regarding cases where "Expression of Interest" has already been issued.
Analysis: 1. The main issue in this case is whether the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the authority to invalidate the provisions of Section 36A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India Regulations. The NCLT ruled that the process for calling "Expression of Interest" is beyond the scope of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 due to the strict time constraints imposed on the completion of the process.
2. The Court, at this stage, declined to interfere with the NCLT's decision. However, it noted that in some instances, the "Expression of Interest" had already been issued by the Resolution Professionals. The Court opined that in such cases, the ongoing process should not be disrupted. Consequently, the Court directed that the NCLT's order dated 05.09.2018 in the State Bank of India vs. Su Kam Power Systems Ltd. case should not impede cases where the "Expression of Interest" has already been initiated.
3. The Court set a future date for the next hearing, indicating that the matter will be further examined on 27.11.2018. This direction provides clarity on the status of cases where the "Expression of Interest" process is already underway, ensuring continuity in those proceedings without being affected by the NCLT's ruling.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
