High Court Upholds Rs.1 Crore SEBI Penalty; Quashes Criminal Proceedings Post-Payment; Emphasizes Case-Specific Ruling.

The HC upheld the imposition of a Rs.1 Crore penalty under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act, with an additional Rs.10 lakhs as interest, on the petitioner for non-payment. The jurisdiction of the 5th Special Court at Calcutta was challenged but ultimately upheld by the HC. After the petitioner deposited the penalty and interest, the court quashed the criminal proceedings initiated by the Special Court. The court emphasized that this resolution was based on the specific circumstances of the case and should not serve as a precedent.

---

---

Issues:
1. Imposition of penalty under SEBI Act
2. Jurisdiction of Special Court at Calcutta
3. Payment of penalty amount and interest

Imposition of penalty under SEBI Act:
The Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of Rs.1 Crore on the petitioner under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act. The order specified the payment method and timeline for the penalty amount. The petitioner failed to pay the penalty, leading to the filing of a complaint by SEBI. The petitioner, during the proceedings, deposited the penalty amount. The court directed the petitioner to pay an additional sum of Rs.10 lakhs towards interest to conclude the matter.

Jurisdiction of Special Court at Calcutta:
SEBI filed a complaint against the petitioner in the 5th Special Court at Calcutta for non-payment of the penalty. The petitioner challenged the jurisdiction of the Calcutta court, arguing that the cause of action did not arise there. The High Court dismissed the revision petition, upholding the jurisdiction of the Special Court at Calcutta. However, after the petitioner deposited the penalty amount, the court quashed the criminal proceedings initiated by the Special Court at Calcutta.

Payment of penalty amount and interest:
The petitioner, a young entrepreneur, paid the penalty amount of Rs.1 Crore during the pendency of the case. Subsequently, the court directed the petitioner to deposit an additional Rs.10 lakhs towards interest within eight weeks. Upon this payment, the criminal proceedings against the petitioner were quashed. The court clarified that the decision was based on the unique circumstances of the case and should not set a precedent for other cases.

This judgment addresses the imposition of a penalty under the SEBI Act, the jurisdiction of the Special Court at Calcutta, and the payment of the penalty amount and interest by the petitioner.

---