Cognizability of Section 174-A IPC upheld, and non-publication in a newspaper did not vitiate proclamation proceedings.

Section 174-A IPC is cognizable and may be prosecuted on a police charge-sheet without a complaint under Section 195 CrPC, because the bar in Section 195 applies to Sections 172 to 188 IPC and does not extend to Section 174-A. In proclamation proceedings under Section 82 CrPC, public reading and affixation are mandatory, but newspaper publication is only directory; non-publication in the directed newspaper does not by itself vitiate the proclamation. The FIR and proceedings under Section 174-A were treated as independent and were not quashed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether an offence under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 could be prosecuted on a charge-sheet without a complaint under Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (ii) Whether non-publication of the proclamation in the newspaper directed by the court vitiated the proceedings under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and warranted quashing of the FIR under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Issue (i): Whether an offence under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 could be prosecuted on a charge-sheet without a complaint under Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Analysis: Section 195(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 bars cognizance of offences under Sections 172 to 188 of the Penal Code, but Section 174-A was inserted later and was not brought within that embargo. The offence is cognizable, and the police are competent to register an FIR, investigate, and file a charge-sheet on which the Magistrate can take cognizance.

Conclusion: The contention was rejected and the prosecution under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was held to be maintainable on a charge-sheet without a complaint under Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Issue (ii): Whether non-publication of the proclamation in the newspaper directed by the court vitiated the proceedings under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and warranted quashing of the FIR under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Analysis: The court distinguished the mandatory requirements in Section 82(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 from the permissive requirement of newspaper publication. The statutory mode of public reading and affixation was treated as mandatory, while publication in a newspaper was held to be directory. Mere non-compliance with the newspaper direction, by itself, did not invalidate the proclamation proceedings. The FIR under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was also treated as an independent proceeding not displaced by settlement of the underlying complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Conclusion: The challenge to the proclamation proceedings failed and quashing of the FIR was refused.

Final Conclusion: The petition was found to be an abuse of the process of the court and was dismissed with costs, leaving the FIR and the proceedings under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute makes only affixation and public reading mandatory under proclamation proceedings, failure to publish in the directed newspaper does not by itself invalidate the proceedings, and Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is cognizable and prosecutable on a police charge-sheet without recourse to Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

---