Bail granted after medical evidence suggested vehicle collision, with investigation complete and cooperation noted.

The Court assessed bail entitlement in connection with the alleged Tikuniya incident by examining the medical and investigative materials. It noted that the post-mortem and injury reports did not show firearm injuries and instead were consistent with a vehicle collision, while witness statements indicated the applicant was in the vehicle during a protest-related on a narrow road. As the charge-sheet had already been filed and the applicant had cooperated in the investigation, the Court held the applicant entitled to bail, subject to furnishing personal bond and sureties on conditions.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to be released on bail in the case arising from the alleged incident at Tikuniya.

Analysis: The materials before the Court showed that the post-mortem and injury reports did not disclose firearm injuries and instead suggested injuries consistent with a vehicle collision. The statements recorded during investigation also indicated that the applicant was present in the vehicle and that the incident occurred in the midst of a large protest crowd standing on both sides of a narrow road. The Court further noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed and that the applicant had cooperated in the investigation.

Conclusion: The applicant was held entitled to bail and was ordered to be released on furnishing personal bond and sureties, subject to conditions.

---