Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the absence of an express provision in the Act, Rules or bye-laws, an elected Chairperson of a cooperative society can be removed by a no-confidence motion, and whether constitutional principles require such a power to be read into the statutory scheme.
Analysis: The constitutional scheme after the Ninety Seventh Amendment treats cooperative societies as democratic institutions intended to function with autonomy, democratic control and professional management. The Board is the entrusted governing body, and the office bearer chosen by that body holds office as a representative of the confidence of the electors. Where the statute, rules or bye-laws are silent, the constitutional mandate cannot be defeated by legislative omission. A cooperative society founded on democratic principles must allow removal of an office bearer who has lost the confidence of the electing body, and the Court may read that constitutional requirement into the governing provisions. On the procedural side, the Court laid down guidelines that a no-confidence motion against an office bearer of a cooperative society may be moved only after two years of assuming office, a defeated motion cannot be reintroduced within one year, the motion must be supported by at least one-third of the elected members of the Board, and it must be carried by more than fifty per cent of the elected members present.
Conclusion: An elected office bearer of a cooperative society can be removed by a no-confidence motion even without an express enabling provision, and the appeal failed.