Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court dismisses special leave petition in absence of respondent; decision by Chief Justice and Justices Khanwilkar, Chandrachud.</h1> <h3>RAJ TELEVISION NETWORK LTD Versus THAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED </h3> The SC dismissed the special leave petition, with no respondent present. The decision was rendered by a bench comprising the Chief Justice, Justice A.M. ... Enforcement of a foreign award - Sections 47 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - HELD THAT:- The special leave petition is dismissed. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, cited 2018 (8) TMI 2131 - On hearing the petitioner's counsel, the Court recorded that it had 'Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.' The operative disposition states: 'The special leave petition is dismissed.' The order reflects a summary adjudication following oral submissions; the respondent did not appear. No substantive reasons or detailed legal analysis are recorded in the order itself. Procedurally, the matter was disposed by an oral order dismissing the special leave petition, with the effect that leave to appeal under Article 136 is refused and the impugned decision below stands affirmed as against the petitioner to the extent challenged in the petition.