TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Allows Reassessment Under Tax Act Amendments</h1> <h3>SRI MOHAN RAO GANDRA Versus UNION OF INDIA</h3> SRI MOHAN RAO GANDRA Versus UNION OF INDIA - [2023] 456 ITR 676 (Telangana) Issues:Challenging legality and validity of notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued post 01.04.2021 but under the un-amended provision. Compliance with Section 148A of the Act regarding conducting an inquiry, providing opportunity of hearing, and considering the assessee's reply before issuing notices. Modification of judgments by the Supreme Court to allow reassessment proceedings under the amended provisions of sections 147 to 151 of the IT Act. Applicability of the Supreme Court's decision in Ashish Agarwal case on similar notices issued post 01.04.2021 nationwide.Analysis:The writ petitions challenged the legality of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act post 01.04.2021 but under the un-amended provision. The petitioners contended that the new Section 148A, inserted by recent amendment effective from 01.04.2021, mandates an inquiry and a hearing before issuing such notices. The petitioners argued that non-compliance with Section 148A rendered the impugned notices null and void, leading to a stay on the notices pending resolution.The Supreme Court, in a related case, observed that the new provisions under the Finance Act, 2021 aimed to protect the rights of the assessee and ensure public interest. While agreeing with the High Courts' views on applying the new provisions to past assessment years, the Supreme Court modified the judgments to allow reassessment proceedings under the amended provisions of sections 147 to 151 of the IT Act. The Court emphasized the need to avoid rendering the Revenue remediless and proposed modifications to facilitate reassessment proceedings under the amended provisions.The Supreme Court's decision in the Ashish Agarwal case was deemed applicable nationwide to similar cases where notices were issued post 01.04.2021. The Court clarified that its decision under Article 142 of the Constitution would govern cases where similar notices were set aside by High Courts or were pending adjudication. The Central Board of Direct Taxes issued instructions for implementing the Supreme Court's judgment, ensuring compliance with the modified procedure for reassessment.Consequently, the batch of writ petitions was disposed of in line with the Supreme Court's judgment in the Ashish Agarwal case. The Court emphasized nationwide applicability and closed miscellaneous applications related to the writ petitions, with no order as to costs.
TaxTMI 