TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a divorced Muslim woman who has not remarried is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (ii) Whether payment of mahr or dower and the rule in Section 127(3)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 extinguish or limit that right.
Issue (i): Whether a divorced Muslim woman who has not remarried is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: Section 125 is a secular, summary remedy designed to prevent vagrancy and destitution. Its application depends on neglect or refusal to maintain a wife unable to maintain herself, and the Explanation expressly includes a divorced woman who has not remarried. The provision is not controlled by the religion of the parties and operates independently of personal law. The statutory right created by Section 125 therefore extends to a divorced Muslim woman if she satisfies the statutory conditions.
Conclusion: The divorced Muslim woman is entitled to seek maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Issue (ii): Whether payment of mahr or dower and the rule in Section 127(3)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 extinguish or limit that right.
Analysis: The liability under Section 125 is not defeated by the contention that Muslim personal law limits maintenance to the period of iddat. Where the divorced wife is unable to maintain herself, personal law does not exclude the statutory remedy. Mahr or dower is an obligation arising from marriage and respect, not a sum payable on divorce within the meaning of Section 127(3)(b). That provision applies only where the wife has received the whole of the sum payable on divorce under applicable personal or customary law, and mahr does not answer that description. Section 127(3)(b) therefore does not cancel the maintenance order on the facts considered.
Conclusion: Payment of mahr does not bar or extinguish the maintenance claim, and Section 127(3)(b) does not operate to cancel the order.
Final Conclusion: The maintenance order in favour of the divorced wife was upheld and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A divorced wife who has not remarried may claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 irrespective of personal law, and mahr is not a sum payable on divorce so as to attract Section 127(3)(b).
TaxTMI 
