Inadvertent EDI shipping bill errors did not bar MEIS benefits where export intent was evident from contemporaneous records.

An inadvertent EDI error in shipping bills should not defeat an export incentive claim where contemporaneous records show a clear intent to claim MEIS and the exports themselves are undisputed. The Court applied a liberal, pragmatic approach and held that existing documentary evidence, together with the absence of any challenge to the genuineness of the exports, justified correction of the shipping bills. The refusal to allow amendment was therefore unjustified, and the exporter was entitled to amendment of the bills and consideration for MEIS benefits on that basis.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to amendment of the shipping bills to correct the inadvertent marking of "N" instead of "Y" in the EDI system and to claim MEIS benefits on that basis.

Analysis: The petitioner's export activity and eligibility for MEIS were not in dispute. The controversy arose from the electronic shipping bills reflecting "N" in the reward column for most invoices, though the manual and template records showed an intention to claim MEIS benefits. The Court noted that the relevant policy framework required a declaration of intent, but also considered that the EDI regime was newly introduced, that the petitioner had consistently disclosed its intent in the shipping bills, and that the omission appeared to be a technical or inadvertent error. The Court further held that the availability of documentary evidence already in existence at the time of export, together with the absence of any challenge to the genuineness of the exports, meant that the mistake should not defeat the claim. Applying the liberal and pragmatic approach adopted in prior MEIS matters, the Court found that the refusal to permit amendment was unjustified.

Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to have the shipping bills amended and to be considered for MEIS benefits on the amended bills.

Final Conclusion: The impugned refusal was quashed, and the respondents were directed to allow amendment of the shipping bills and extend MEIS benefits in accordance with law within the stipulated time.

Ratio Decidendi: An inadvertent error in EDI shipping bills should not defeat a substantive export incentive claim where the exporter's intent is otherwise evident from contemporaneous records and the export transaction itself is undisputed.

---