Tribunal clarifies authority to file withdrawal application under I&B Code

The Tribunal held that the resolution professional lacks the authority to unilaterally file a withdrawal application under Section 12A of the I&B Code. Only the applicant who originally submitted the application under Section 7 or 9 can seek withdrawal. Despite Regulation 30A providing a withdrawal procedure for resolution professionals, it does not override the explicit provisions of Section 12A. The judgment emphasizes adherence to statutory provisions, directing the case to proceed in line with Section 12A and underscoring the applicant's exclusive right to seek withdrawal before the Adjudicating Authority.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the resolution professional can file an application for withdrawal under Section 12A of the I&B CodeRs.
2. Interpretation of Regulation 30A of the 'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Regulation Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016' in relation to the resolution professional's authority to move the application for withdrawal.

Analysis:
1. The judgment delves into the issue of whether the resolution professional has the authority to file an application for withdrawal under Section 12A of the I&B Code. The Tribunal highlighted that Section 12A explicitly states that only the applicant who initially filed the application under Section 7 or 9 can move such an application for withdrawal. It was emphasized that the resolution professional does not possess the legal standing to initiate the withdrawal process under the mentioned sections of the I&B Code. The Tribunal stressed the importance of adhering to the statutory provisions and the clear language of the law in determining the eligibility to file for withdrawal.

2. The Tribunal also examined Regulation 30A of the 'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Regulation Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016' to ascertain the resolution professional's role in the withdrawal process. While Regulation 30A outlines a procedure for the resolution professional to submit the withdrawal application to the Adjudicating Authority upon approval by the committee, the Tribunal asserted that this regulation cannot supersede the substantive provisions of Section 12A. The judgment emphasized that the applicant, as defined under the I&B Code, retains the exclusive right to seek withdrawal of the application before the Adjudicating Authority. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the resolution professional's involvement in the withdrawal process is limited by the statutory framework provided in Section 12A.

In conclusion, the judgment clarifies that under the I&B Code, the resolution professional does not possess the authority to independently file an application for withdrawal under Section 12A. The exclusive right to seek withdrawal lies with the applicant who initially submitted the application under Section 7 or 9. The Tribunal underscored the significance of upholding the statutory provisions and directed the matter to be scheduled for further orders to monitor the case's progression in accordance with Section 12A.

---