Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after invoking the statutory mechanism under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 and participating in conciliation before the Facilitation Council, the appellant could insist on arbitration only under the contractual arbitration clause instead of the statutory arbitration route under the Act.
Analysis: Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 creates a self-contained dispute resolution mechanism. On a reference under sub-section (1), the Council may conduct conciliation under sub-section (2), and if conciliation fails, sub-section (3) requires the dispute to proceed to arbitration either by the Council itself or through an ADR institution or centre. The provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 apply to such arbitration as if it were pursuant to an arbitration agreement. Having voluntarily invoked the statutory remedy and participated in conciliation, the appellant was bound by the full statutory sequence under Section 18, and the existence of an independent contractual arbitration clause did not displace that statutory mandate.
Conclusion: The objection based on the contractual arbitration clause was rejected, and the statutory reference for arbitration under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 was held to be valid.