Petitioner acquitted in betting case, petitions withdrawn, multiple cases dismissed, one for non-prosecution.

The petitioner was acquitted in a prosecution case for alleged involvement in betting money, not playing rummy. The writ petition before the Madras High Court was withdrawn, rendering previous observations invalid. The special leave petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the acquittal and writ petition withdrawal. Multiple petitions were dismissed as withdrawn upon counsel's request. In a specific case, the petitioner's name was substituted, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Another petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence, with all pending applications disposed of.

---

---

Issues:
1. Acquittal of the petitioner in a prosecution case.
2. Withdrawal of writ petition filed before the Madras High Court.
3. Dismissal of special leave petition as infructuous.
4. Dismissal of multiple petitions as withdrawn.
5. Substitution of petitioner's name in a specific case.
6. Dismissal of a petition for non-prosecution.

Acquittal of the petitioner in a prosecution case:
The trial court acquitted the petitioner on 11th October, 2014, in a prosecution case where the allegation was that the petitioner's members were involved in betting money for profit, not playing rummy. As there was no accusation of playing rummy (13 cards) by the petitioner or its members, the senior counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition filed before the Madras High Court (WP No.21620 of 2011), which was permitted by the court. Consequently, the observations made by the High Court in the writ petition or in the writ appeal filed by the State were declared to be no longer valid.

Dismissal of special leave petition as infructuous:
Given the acquittal of the petitioner in the prosecution case and the withdrawal of the writ petition, the special leave petition was deemed infructuous and subsequently dismissed by the court.

Dismissal of multiple petitions as withdrawn:
Several petitions, including W.P.(C) No.1060/2013, 1073/2013, 402/2014, 200/2014, and SLP(C) No.15568/2015, were sought to be withdrawn by the petitioners' counsel, and permission was granted. Consequently, these petitions were dismissed as withdrawn by the court.

Substitution of petitioner's name in a specific case:
In W.P.(C) No.1061/2013, the court allowed the substitution of the petitioner's name from M/s. Darkhorse Farm & Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. to Vidura Games Private Limited. Subsequently, the counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted, leading to the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn.

Dismissal of a petition for non-prosecution:
In W.P.(C) No. 859/2014, where no appearance was made on behalf of the petitioner, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution by the court. Additionally, all pending applications in these matters were disposed of by the court.

---