Assessee's Appeal: Comparables Selection Decisions The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee concerning the selection of comparables for the Mapping Segment of their business operations. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee concerning the selection of comparables for the Mapping Segment of their business operations. Infosys BPM Ltd. was excluded due to misalignment with the assessee's functional profile, while Dun & Bradstreet Technology & Data Services Pvt. Ltd. was deemed incomparable due to significant related party transactions. Nihilent Analytics Limited was upheld as a comparable by the Tribunal, concurring with the DRP's decision, subject to conditions. The importance of selecting appropriate comparables for a fair assessment was emphasized in the judgment pronounced on 02/11/2021.
Issues Involved: 1. Selection of comparables for Mapping Segment.
Analysis: The appeal was filed against the order passed by the Assessing Officer under sections 143(3) read with 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The issue at hand pertains to the Mapping Segment of the assessee's business operations. The Group's parent company, COWI Holding A/S, is a significant entity in the field of engineering, environmental science, and economics. COWI India Private Limited, a subsidiary of COWI A/S, operates under two major segments: Engineering Design services and Mapping services.
Comparables Selection: The assessee raised objections to the selection of two comparables, namely Infosys BPM Ltd., Dun & Bradstreet Technology & Data Services Pvt. Ltd, and Nihilent Analytics Limited. Infosys BPM Ltd. was found unsuitable as it did not align with the functional profile of the assessee. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Infosys BPM Ltd. from the final list of comparables. Regarding Dun & Bradstreet Technology and Data Services Pvt. Ltd., it was noted that the company had significant related party transactions, rendering it incomparable to the assessee. Thus, the Tribunal upheld the objection and ruled against including Dun & Bradstreet Technology and Data Services Pvt. Ltd. as a comparable.
Nihilent Analytics Limited: The assessee contested the inclusion of Nihilent Analytics Limited as a comparable. Nihilent is primarily engaged in providing software services and does not hold any inventory. The Tribunal reviewed the details and concurred with the decision of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) to include Nihilent Analytics Limited as a comparable, subject to certain conditions. Consequently, the Tribunal declined to interfere with the DRP's order on this particular issue.
In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate comparables for a fair assessment. The judgment was pronounced in open court on 02/11/2021.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
