Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte order passed by the Tribunal should be recalled on showing sufficient cause for non-appearance under Rule 24 of the ITAT Rules, 1963.
Analysis: The assessee explained non-appearance by stating that counsel was occupied with the death of a close relative and the attendant funeral ceremonies, which prevented attendance and timely intimation for adjournment. The Tribunal accepted this explanation as sufficient cause. Since the assessee's submissions had not been considered in the earlier proceedings, and in the interest of justice, the Tribunal found it appropriate to restore the appeals for hearing under Rule 24 of the ITAT Rules, 1963.
Conclusion: The recall of the ex parte order was allowed and the appeals were restored for hearing in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An ex parte order may be recalled where non-appearance is supported by sufficient cause and restoration is necessary to secure a fair hearing in the interest of justice.