Department's Appeal for AY 2010-11 Partly Allowed Despite Delay

The department's appeal for AY 2010-11 was partly allowed despite a ten-day delay in filing, with adjustments made for transfer pricing, liquidated damages, advances, provision for warranty, and loss on suspended contracts. Rectification orders were deemed void ab initio due to lack of opportunity for the assessee to be heard. Disallowances for AY 2011-12 were partly upheld, with adjustments reduced and rectification orders set aside. The final outcome of various appeals resulted in partial allowances and one full allowance, with the decision pronounced on 11.06.2018.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Condonation of delay in filing the department’s appeal.
2. Transfer Pricing adjustments.
3. Disallowance of provision for liquidated damages.
4. Disallowance of advances and deposits written off.
5. Disallowance of provision for warranty.
6. Provision for loss on suspended contracts.
7. Adjustment of refund and levy of interest u/s 234D.
8. Validity of rectification orders u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Condonation of Delay in Filing the Department’s Appeal:
The department’s appeal for AY 2010-11 was delayed by ten days due to file transit through the proper channel. The delay condonation application and affidavit were considered, and in the interest of justice, the delay was condoned despite opposition from the assessee.

2. Transfer Pricing Adjustments:
- AY 2010-11: The TPO made adjustments based on a fresh search for comparables, resulting in an average margin of 16.77%. The Ld. DRP directed the re-computation of ALP but upheld an adjustment of Rs. 42,50,763/- for intra-group services. The ITAT directed the AO to pass the final assessment order incorporating the adjustment to Rs. 9,91,844/- only, representing the disallowance of the mark-up charged by the AE.
- AY 2011-12: The Ld. DRP reduced the transfer pricing adjustments from Rs. 8,28,95,238/- to Rs. 3,06,96,810/-. The ITAT upheld the Ld. DRP's decision that services offered by the AE were not stewardship services. The ITAT restored the issue of entity-level profit margin to the Ld. DRP for a speaking order.
- Rectification Orders: The TPO passed rectification orders u/s 154, which were challenged for violating principles of natural justice and statutory provisions. The ITAT set aside the rectification order dated 25.02.2016 as void ab initio due to the lack of opportunity for the assessee to be heard.

3. Disallowance of Provision for Liquidated Damages:
- AY 2010-11: The ITAT upheld the directions of the Ld. DRP to delete the disallowance, subject to the assessee substantiating before the AO that tax due on excess provision written back had been paid.
- AY 2011-12: The ITAT restored the issue to the AO with similar directions as for AY 2010-11.

4. Disallowance of Advances and Deposits Written Off:
- AY 2010-11: The Ld. DRP directed the deletion of disallowance, finding the write-off to be revenue in nature. The ITAT upheld this decision.
- AY 2011-12: The ITAT dismissed the department’s ground as it did not arise from the directions of the Ld. DRP.

5. Disallowance of Provision for Warranty:
- AY 2010-11: The Ld. DRP deleted the disallowance, noting that the issue was similar to AY 2008-09 where it was allowed. The ITAT upheld this decision.
- AY 2011-12: The ITAT upheld the Ld. DRP's decision to delete the disallowance, noting consistency with previous years.

6. Provision for Loss on Suspended Contracts:
- AY 2010-11: The ITAT dismissed the assessee’s claim for deduction as the liability had not crystallized during the year.
- AY 2011-12: The ITAT allowed the deduction as the bank guarantee was en-cashed during the year, crystallizing the liability.

7. Adjustment of Refund and Levy of Interest u/s 234D:
- AY 2011-12: The assessee’s ground challenging the adjustment of refund and consequent levy of interest was not pressed and was dismissed as such.

8. Validity of Rectification Orders u/s 154:
- The ITAT found that the TPO violated principles of natural justice by not providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard before enhancing the income. The rectification order dated 25.02.2016 was set aside as void ab initio.

Final Result:
1. ITA 494/Kol/2015: Partly allowed.
2. ITA 567/Kol/2015: Partly allowed for statistical purposes.
3. ITA 1057/Del/2016: Partly allowed.
4. ITA 1154/Del/2016: Partly allowed.
5. ITA 3207/Del/2016: Allowed.

The order was pronounced in the open court on 11.06.2018.

---