Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the post of President of a municipality reserved for Scheduled Castes women, only a member elected from a ward reserved for Scheduled Castes women could contest, or whether any elected Scheduled Caste woman member could contest.
Analysis: Article 243T of the Constitution of India, read with section 10(5) and section 18 of the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 and rule 70(4) of the Haryana Municipal Election Rules, 1978, contemplates reservation of the office of President by rotation among identified electoral categories. The category that matters is not merely caste or gender in isolation, but the specific seat from which the member has been elected. A member elected from a general women's seat does not become a candidate from the Scheduled Castes women category merely because she belongs to a Scheduled Caste. Rotation and reservation operate on the basis of the category of the elected seat, and the scheme would be defeated if all Scheduled Caste members were treated as one undifferentiated class for contesting the reserved office.
Conclusion: The respondent was not eligible to contest for the reserved presidential office, and the appellant, being the sole elected member from the Scheduled Castes women category, was rightly entitled to hold the office.