Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80IA(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of profits derived from construction of road signages and foot over bridges, treating the activity as development of infrastructure facility.
Analysis: The claim had already been decided against the assessee in earlier assessment years on identical facts. The activity undertaken consisted mainly of putting up road signages and constructing foot over bridges, which did not amount to development of a road or other infrastructure facility within the meaning of section 80IA(4). The issue was covered by the earlier orders in the assessee's own case, and the mere pendency of the assessee's appeal before the High Court did not justify keeping the present appeals pending.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to deduction under section 80IA(4); the issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The consolidated appeals failed on the only substantive issue and the disallowance of deduction under section 80IA(4) was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Construction of road signages and foot over bridges, by itself, does not constitute development of infrastructure facility in the nature of a road for the purposes of section 80IA(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.