Abatement and Works Contract Service classification remanded for fresh adjudication after prior issues were left unexamined.

Denial of abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST and classification of the activity as Works Contract Service were sent back for fresh examination. The Tribunal noted that an earlier order in the assessee's own case had already remanded these issues to the original authority, and that the present dispute related to a subsequent period. It also observed that other submissions raised by the assessee had not been considered below. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter restored for de novo adjudication after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the denial of abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST and the classification of the activities as not falling under Works Contract Service required fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that an earlier order in the appellant's own case had remanded the matter to the original authority for a fresh decision on entitlement to abatement and on whether the activity was classifiable as works contract service. It also noted that the present dispute related to a subsequent period and that the other submissions made by the appellant had not been considered by the authorities below. In these circumstances, the Tribunal found it appropriate to set aside the impugned order and restore the matter for de novo consideration after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand.

---