Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2022 (9) TMI 1390 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Orders Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Initiation The tribunal allowed the petition and ordered the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor. Mr. Kotoju ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Orders Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Initiation

                            The tribunal allowed the petition and ordered the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor. Mr. Kotoju Vasudeva Rao was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), a moratorium was declared, and a public announcement of CIRP initiation was directed. The petitioner was ordered to deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- with the IRP for initial CIRP expenses. The conditions for triggering CIRP were met as the debt was due and payable, with no pre-existing disputes substantiated by the Corporate Debtor, leading to the tribunal's decision.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether the documentary evidence furnished with the application shows that the debt is due and payable and has not yet been paid.
                            2. Whether there is the existence of a dispute between the parties or the record of the pendency of a suit or arbitration proceeding filed before the receipt of demand notice of the unpaid operational debt in relation to such dispute.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Whether the documentary evidence furnished with the application shows that the debt is due and payable and has not yet been paid:

                            The Operational Creditor, formerly known as Green Ark Enersol Pvt. Ltd, supplied 16,130 AMR modems along with antenna and communication cables to the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor acknowledged the receipt of these modems and confirmed that 5,000 had been installed and integrated with TANGEDCO systems. Despite this, the Corporate Debtor failed to clear the dues as per the purchase order dated 03.11.2015. The Operational Creditor sent a demand notice dated 30.11.2020, but received no reply or payment from the Corporate Debtor. The tribunal noted that there was no dispute raised regarding the existence of the debt and that part payments had been made by the Corporate Debtor towards the claimed amount. The tribunal concluded that the documentary evidence clearly showed that the debt was due and payable, but had not been paid.

                            2. Whether there is the existence of a dispute between the parties or the record of the pendency of a suit or arbitration proceeding filed before the receipt of demand notice of the unpaid operational debt in relation to such dispute:

                            The Corporate Debtor argued that no agreement existed with the Operational Creditor and questioned the latter's locus standi, suggesting that the Operational Creditor did not substantiate its claim of being formerly known as Green Ark. The Corporate Debtor also claimed that Green Ark had only supplied 16,140 modems against an order of 20,000 and completed the installation of only 2,945 modems. Due to delays, TANGEDCO halted payments to the Corporate Debtor. Despite the shortfall, the Corporate Debtor paid Rs. 2,50,52,800/- out of Rs. 6,26,32,001/- and an additional Rs. 22,85,641/- for the installation of 2,945 modems. The Corporate Debtor contended that Green Ark defaulted on its obligations under the purchase order and that mutual understanding was reached that TANGEDCO would make the remaining payment upon completion of the work. The Corporate Debtor also highlighted serious disputes regarding the quality of work done under the purchase order. However, the tribunal found that no disputes were raised before the receipt of the demand notice and no records were provided to show any pre-existing disputes.

                            Conclusion:

                            The tribunal relied on the Supreme Court rulings in M/s Innoventive Industries Vs. ICICI Bank and Mobilox Innovations Private Limited Vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited to determine the conditions under which an operational creditor can trigger the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The tribunal found that the conditions for triggering CIRP were met, as the debt was due and payable, and no pre-existing disputes were substantiated by the Corporate Debtor. Therefore, the petition was allowed, and the tribunal ordered the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor.

                            Orders:

                            1. The tribunal appointed Mr. Kotoju Vasudeva Rao as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
                            2. A moratorium was declared prohibiting the institution or continuation of suits or proceedings against the Corporate Debtor.
                            3. The tribunal directed the public announcement of the initiation of CIRP and ordered the petitioner to deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- with the IRP for initial CIRP expenses.
                            4. The tribunal directed the Registry to send a copy of the order to the Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad, and to furnish a free copy to the parties involved.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found