Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the resolution plan approved by the committee of creditors satisfied the requirements of section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for approval by the Adjudicating Authority.
Analysis: The application was examined on the touchstone of section 31(1), which requires that the plan be approved by the committee of creditors, comply with section 30(2), and contain provisions for effective implementation. The records showed that the plan was approved by the requisite voting share of the committee of creditors. The resolution professional certified compliance with the Code, the CIRP Regulations, and eligibility under section 29A. The plan provided for payment of insolvency resolution process costs, treatment of operational creditors and dissenting financial creditors, management and supervision through a monitoring committee, implementation safeguards, and funding arrangements. The Tribunal also noted that the plan did not contravene any law and that the performance security had been furnished.
Conclusion: The requirements of section 31(1) were satisfied and the resolution plan was approved.
Final Conclusion: The approved resolution plan became binding on the corporate debtor and its stakeholders, and the moratorium under section 14 ceased to operate.
Ratio Decidendi: A resolution plan may be approved under section 31(1) only if it is duly approved by the committee of creditors, satisfies the mandatory requirements of section 30(2), and provides for effective implementation without contravening the law.