Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the import of natural rubber was protected by the transitional arrangement in the Import-Export Policy, so as to avoid confiscation and penalty after the import restriction was imposed.
Analysis: The applicable policy change introduced a restriction permitting import of natural rubber only through specified customs ports and the dispute turned on para 1.5 of the Import-Export Policy, which protects imports where shipment is made within the original validity of an irrevocable letter of credit opened before the restriction date. The relevant validity was the expiry date of the irrevocable letter of credit, not merely the earlier shipment-date validity noted by the Commissioner. As the shipment was made before expiry of the letter of credit and before the restriction was imposed, the import was not hit by the subsequent restriction.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to confiscation and the penalty could not survive. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The confiscation order and consequential penalty were set aside because the import fell within the protective transitional arrangement available under the policy.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a policy restriction is imposed after issue of an irrevocable letter of credit, the decisive date for transitional protection is the expiry of the letter of credit, and imports shipped within that period are not liable to confiscation under the subsequent restriction.