Meaning of "trade" under IPC Section 168: railway apprenticeship for training was not treated as trade, so conviction failed.

The expression "trade" under Section 168 of the Indian Penal Code was construed in context and not in an unduly broad sense. A railway apprentice-trainee engaged for instruction and preparation for possible future employment was not carrying on business or trade for profit, and receipt of a stipend did not convert the training arrangement into employment or trade. On that construction, the apprentice-trainee was not engaged in trade within the section, and the conviction could not be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether engagement as an apprentice-trainee under a railway training arrangement amounted to engaging in "trade" within the meaning of Section 168 of the Indian Penal Code.

Analysis: The expression "trade" was construed according to its context, and not in an unduly expansive sense. The training arrangement was entered into for the purpose of receiving instruction and preparing for possible future employment, not for carrying on business or trade for profit. Receipt of a stipend during the training period did not convert the trainee into an employee or make the training activity a trade. The arrangement, viewed either in its narrow or wider sense, did not amount to carrying on trade as a means of livelihood.

Conclusion: The apprentice-trainee was not engaged in trade within Section 168 of the Indian Penal Code, and the conviction could not be sustained.

---