Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to total waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty, and whether the dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act warranted remand.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the case did not justify complete waiver of pre-deposit. It upheld the direction to deposit the amount fixed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for the appeal to be heard, while granting waiver of the balance pre-deposit on compliance. Since the Commissioner (Appeals) had not decided the appeal on merits, the order was set aside and the matter was sent back for fresh decision after affording an opportunity of hearing, subject to deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs.
Conclusion: The assessee was not granted total waiver, but the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on compliance with the stipulated pre-deposit.