Inclusion of New Hind Silk House as Financial Creditor Upheld in Committee of Creditors

The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of New Hind Silk House Pvt. Ltd. as a financial creditor in the Committee of Creditors, dismissing claims of limitation, fraud, and fabrication. The RP's actions were deemed compliant with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, with documents such as balance confirmations and audited balance sheets considered credible. The application was dismissed due to lack of merit and non-joinder of necessary parties.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Legality of inclusion of New Hind Silk House Pvt. Ltd. as a financial creditor in the Committee of Creditors (CoC).
2. Allegation of the claim being barred by limitation.
3. Validity of balance confirmations and audited balance sheets used to substantiate the claim.
4. Allegation of fraud and fabrication by the Resolution Professional (RP).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Legality of Inclusion of New Hind Silk House Pvt. Ltd. as a Financial Creditor:
The applicant challenged the inclusion of New Hind Silk House Pvt. Ltd. as a financial creditor, arguing that the claim was barred by limitation and improperly admitted by the RP. The RP, however, verified and admitted the claim based on documents such as balance confirmations and audited balance sheets, which were approved by the CoC. The Tribunal found that the RP acted in compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and related regulations, determining that the admission of the claim was not in contravention of any legal provisions.

2. Allegation of the Claim Being Barred by Limitation:
The applicant argued that the claim was barred by limitation, citing that the last payment of interest was received on 05/08/2016, and no further payments were made. The RP countered this by presenting balance confirmations dated 01/04/2016 and 01/04/2017, signed by the directors and bearing the company's seal, indicating an acknowledgment of debt. The Tribunal held that these documents were admissible as evidence, thus dismissing the limitation argument.

3. Validity of Balance Confirmations and Audited Balance Sheets:
The applicant objected to the reliance on balance sheets for the years 2016-17 and 2017-18, prepared after the RP's appointment, and the balance confirmations, questioning their authenticity and method of delivery. The Tribunal noted that the balance confirmations were signed by the CD's directors and bore the company seal, making them credible. Additionally, the RP was empowered to appoint auditors to update the balance sheets, and the Tribunal found no substantial proof of collusion or fabrication, thus validating the documents used to substantiate the claim.

4. Allegation of Fraud and Fabrication by the RP:
The applicant alleged that the RP fabricated documents to include New Hind Silk House Pvt. Ltd. as a creditor. The Tribunal emphasized that any fraud or fabrication must be proven with substantive evidence. The balance confirmations and audited balance sheets were found to be genuine, signed by the CD's directors, and bearing the company seal. The Tribunal concluded that without substantial proof, the allegations of fraud could not be upheld.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding no merit in the applicant's arguments. The RP's actions were in compliance with the IBC and related regulations, and the documents used to admit the claim were deemed credible and admissible. The Tribunal also noted the application was flawed for non-joinder of necessary parties, specifically the directors who signed the disputed documents and New Hind Silk House Pvt. Ltd.

---