Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the use of stents, valves or medicines during a surgical procedure in a hospital amounts to a sale within the meaning of Section 2(ac) of the U.P. VAT Act.
Analysis: The disputed temporary assessment orders treated the implantation of stents and valves, along with medicines and other consumables charged in the hospital bill, as a taxable sale. The controlling Division Bench view held that recovery of charges for surgery and consumables in a composite medical procedure does not convert the implantation of a stent or valve into a sale. The contrary view taken in the impugned orders could not prevail in the face of that binding precedent, which had neither been overruled nor held to be bad law.
Conclusion: The use of stents or valves during surgery does not amount to a sale under Section 2(ac) of the U.P. VAT Act, and the impugned assessment orders were liable to be quashed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeds on the strength of the earlier Division Bench ruling, and the assessing authority remains free to decide the final assessment on all relevant material.
Ratio Decidendi: In a composite medical treatment transaction, the mere recovery of charges for surgery, drugs or consumables does not by itself create a taxable sale of implanted medical devices.